RECENT  POSTS:  » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/04/2011

NY marriages can be as areligious as the couple wishes, says 1902

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2011-05-04 At 9.12.45 Am
Screen Shot 2011-05-04 At 9.12.09 Am

And another, from the New York Times circa 1921:

201105040918-1
...
201105040918
Marriage by Contract [NYT, Aug. 28, 1921]

All the way back to the late Roman Republican and early Augustan Empire? Why that sounds pretty darn traditional to us!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails