RECENT  POSTS:  » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/04/2011

NY marriages can be as areligious as the couple wishes, says 1902

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2011-05-04 At 9.12.45 Am
Screen Shot 2011-05-04 At 9.12.09 Am

And another, from the New York Times circa 1921:

201105040918-1
...
201105040918
Marriage by Contract [NYT, Aug. 28, 1921]

All the way back to the late Roman Republican and early Augustan Empire? Why that sounds pretty darn traditional to us!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails