RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/24/2011

'Even President Obama...' : The new 'some of my best friends are...'

by Jeremy Hooper

And this is what President Obama's non-support does to us. Or one thing, at least:

National Organization For Marriage's latest e-blast
201106241625

We hear it all the time: Strident marriage foes who oppose President Barack Obama in a gagillion-and-six ways (including on marriage/civil unions) taking the Commander-in-Chief's stated position against marriage equality and using it against pro-equality advocates for both strategy and cover. Because of his own record, groups like NOM are allowed to take this major bone that he's thrown them and add it to all of the other bones that they get from their organized movement. Anti-equality advocates get a full stockpile of these bones, from the overheated to the politically reluctant. Gays get the doghouse.

Sure, President Obama's lack of support for DOMA and state/federal marriage amendments adds a colorful lining, and his support for so many other LGBT-inclusive policies keep the door open for growth. All appreciated. But up until the moment when he stops opposing same-sex marriage in word, policy, press release, and political calculation, then this President will remain a card in the opposition's deck. A powerful one, unfortunately.

Break

*RELATED: What the President should've said last night: A President in NYC: (theoretical) Remarks as (ideally) prepared [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails