RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/08/2011

Forward or reverse? Target opts for neutral

by Jeremy Hooper

Unfortunate:

Target Corp. said it is remaining "neutral" on Minnesota's controversial marriage amendment, despite the company's long history of policies friendly to gays and lesbians.

At its annual meeting today, Target chairman and CEO Gregg Steinhafel was asked about the company's stance on the amendment, which would put a ban on same-sex marriage into the Minnesota constitution.

"Our position at this particular time is that we are going to be neutral on that particular issue, as we would be on other social issues that have polarizing points of view," Steinhafel said.

Target CEO: We'll remain neutral on gay-marriage amendment [TwinCities.com]

Someday, the choice between treating LGBT citizens like equal human beings vs. treating discrimination like a "family value" will not be seen as polarizing. Until then: Our would-be, should-be, could-be allies can and will continue to paint this whole thing as a "controversy," even though the clear and undeniable stakes are between one crew that feels wholly comfortable to say stuff like this...

Minn. For Marriage's chief lobbyist: Gays 'live in conflict with how we are made' [G-A-Y]

Audio: Minnesota Family Council's Barb Anderson promotes
"ex-gay"and the general idea that gays are public health hazard
[G-A-Y]

Minnesota Family Council researcher: 'GSAs affirm sexual disorders' [G-A-Y]

Now-yanked docs that liken gays to things like bestiality
and express outright hostility towards gay normalcy
[G-A-Y]

Document roundup: Years of MFC lies, misreps,
and propaganda all geared towards "changing" gays
[G-A-Y]

Yet another yanked MFC doc: Teaching gay tolerance = 'psychological tampering' [G-A-Y]

Researcher Barb Anderson vs. those who'd "normalize" homosexuality
rather than embrace her scientifically-rejected "ex-gay" viewpoints
[G-A-Y]

Minnesota Family Council: Resist same-sex marriage like Lincoln resisted slavery [G-A-Y]

MFC President Tom Prichard likens same-sex marriage to the mortgage crisis [G-A-Y]

...about another crew that just wants to live and love in peace already!

You know, you have a real opportunity here, Target. You can shop around for a better deal all you want --principled fortitude will always come with a premium, regardless of trends.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails