RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/08/2011

Video: NY Sen. Greg Ball's continued support for needless obstacles

by Jeremy Hooper

On last night's edition of "Capitol Tonight", NY state senator Greg Ball (R-Putnam) built on his belief that gay people's marriages must come with extra religious shielding that has never, ever applied to any other kind of civilly-bonded couple -- extra religious-shielding that the organizaed marriage equality opposition admits will never satisfy their desires. Plus Ball also suggests an overwrought, separate-and-unequal civil unions system that would then be dependent on a theoretical majority vote before gay New Yorkers could be granted their fair and equal citizenship. Have a look:

Ugh, and again with the "even President Obama and Secy. Clinton don't support gay marriage" lines. We say "ugh" not only because those lines are beside the point and highly selective, but also because they are unfortunately still true. That reality needs change (that we can believe in).

Some realities:

  • Marriage equality has majority support in NY.
  • NY's entire eastern border of states already have marriage equality -- marriages that the state itself fully recognizes. The state is quite literally exporting the commerce attached to weddings that it will legally recognize.
  • Civil unions will never be acceptable, as they are patently unequal.
  • Civil rights should never go before a majority vote, even in state where we're fairly certain equality would prevail (as we are in NY)
  • Civil marriage and religious ceremony are already separate concepts, and should not be tripped up by faith-motivated talking points
  • Many of those faith-motivated talking points are not even dependent on civil marriage equality (inclusive teaching, adoption rights, etc.), but rather LGBT non-discrimination in general -- something that is hopefully not up for debate in a state like NY. Or anywhere, ultimately.
  • The legislature is elected to do the job of the people. This (non-)issue has more than met the necessary criterium for legislative support.

Pass this bill. The full bill. The equal bill. The bill that resolves the issue, not defers to a future day's more willingly principled problem-solvers.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails