RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/12/2011

Because everyone else is focusing on the Casey Anthony Trial -- why not NOM?

by Jeremy Hooper

Even more questionable pushes from the National Organization For Marriage:

Screen Shot 2011-07-12 At 9.28.46 Am
[NOM's Facebook Wall]

I don't know, there's just something about America's most prominent anti-marriage-equality group trying to draw a connection between a child's tragic death and an evolving marriage culture. Politically, it makes me cheer the dwindling sense of pragmatism that leads NOM post nonsense like this. Though personally, it makes me pretty damn sad for a state of affairs that so casually positions my loving, thoroughly pro-family home as being what's wrong about an America where heterosexual marriage and family slip-ups are a dime a dozen, and truly tragic trials are turned into ratings-grabbing soap operas.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails