RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/29/2011

Glenn Stanton responds to my post; gives me another opp. to highlight his extreme view

by Jeremy Hooper

Yesterday, I wrote a piece about Glenn Stanton's view that homosexuality constitutes a "a particularly evil lie of Satan because he knows that it overthrows the very image of the Trinitarian God in creation" in which I argued that the prominent Focus on the Family staffer should own this view whenever he speaks on the subject of civil rights for LGBT people. Now comes this glib response via Glenn Stanton's personal blog, followed by my at-this-point-unapproved reply to it:

201107291409
[SOURCE: Glenn Stanton's blog] (***POST NOW DELETED. SEE BELOW!)

Bring it. I live for this.

And who knows, maybe saying that "nothing else challenges this image of the Triune God so profoundly and thoroughly as homosexuality" will help Focus on the Family's desire for a newer, softer image. Maybe it will stop companies like Tom's or the NCAA from having to back away from the organization that's so largely known for animus. I fail to see how.

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E88E5D8A5970D

*UPDATE: In a very telling turn of events, Glenn, after first choosing to engage me a little more, proceeded to abruptly delete the post. Here's how the page looked right before it was pulled (sans one more comment from me, which I guess will now forever be lost in moderation hell):

201107292300

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails