RECENT  POSTS:  » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead » Congressional right wing's right-side-of-history whip count: 8–271 » NOM, Manhattan Declaration turn Unitarian's anti-slavery, anti-war into pro-discrimination anthem » Matt Barber and Peter LaBarbera tease America's coming anti-gay street revolts » FRC writer: We're not all the same, 'gay agenda' is 'dangerous for the wellbeing of this nation' » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/29/2011

Glenn Stanton responds to my post; gives me another opp. to highlight his extreme view

by Jeremy Hooper

Yesterday, I wrote a piece about Glenn Stanton's view that homosexuality constitutes a "a particularly evil lie of Satan because he knows that it overthrows the very image of the Trinitarian God in creation" in which I argued that the prominent Focus on the Family staffer should own this view whenever he speaks on the subject of civil rights for LGBT people. Now comes this glib response via Glenn Stanton's personal blog, followed by my at-this-point-unapproved reply to it:

201107291409
[SOURCE: Glenn Stanton's blog] (***POST NOW DELETED. SEE BELOW!)

Bring it. I live for this.

And who knows, maybe saying that "nothing else challenges this image of the Triune God so profoundly and thoroughly as homosexuality" will help Focus on the Family's desire for a newer, softer image. Maybe it will stop companies like Tom's or the NCAA from having to back away from the organization that's so largely known for animus. I fail to see how.

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E88E5D8A5970D

*UPDATE: In a very telling turn of events, Glenn, after first choosing to engage me a little more, proceeded to abruptly delete the post. Here's how the page looked right before it was pulled (sans one more comment from me, which I guess will now forever be lost in moderation hell):

201107292300

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails