RECENT  POSTS:  » Breaking: Arkansas's Republican governor won't sign license-to-discriminate bill in its current form » AFA goes after Megyn Kelly for suggesting Indiana protect gays and lesbians from discrimination » Hillary Clinton comes out against Arkansas license-to-disriminate bill!! » #RFRA and a movement that shirks responsibility (almost) as much as it shirks equality » Audio: Limbaugh admits #RFRA fight is about same-sex marriage; links homosexuality to bestiality » Sen Schumer, federal #RFRA coauthor, knocks down lie that Indiana's version is the same » Video: I can't fathom invoking concentration camps in my political discourse. But Glenn Beck on the other hand... » Get a load of this double-talk from the Family Research Council #RFRA #Indiana » NOM admits 'religious freedom' bills are about discriminating against same-sex couples; thanks, NOM » 'Indianapolis Star' to Governor Pence: FIX THIS NOW  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/20/2011

DOMA disadvantages are within Minnery's Focus, he just doesn't care

by Jeremy Hooper

At today's DOMA hearing, Tom "Someone who is a practicing homosexual is a non starter for the group" Minnery, a Senior Vice President at Focus on the "homosexuality is a particularly evil lie of Satan" Family, was forced to admit the obvious about the harms DOMA poses to same-sex couples and their families:

LEAHY: Are they not disadvantaged by not having the same financial benefits that an opposite sex family would have?

Screen Shot 2011-07-20 At 11.31.27 AmMINNERY: Well, as I say, not knowing the details of which families you are speaking off, certainly children are better off with parents in the home.

LEAHY: Yes or no, it’s not a trick question — if you have parents legally married under the laws of the state — one set of parents are entitled to certain financial benefits for their children, the other set of parents are denied those same financial benefits for their children…are not those children of the second family, are they not at a disadvantage, yes or no?

MINNERY: That would be yes, as you asked the question narrowly Senator.
Focus On The Family Witness Admits Children Are Disadvantaged By Lack Of Protections For Same-Sex Couples [Think Progress -- LGBT]

It's a "yes" however you ask the question, Mr. Minnery. The problem lies with those who want to define the world narrowly, not the queries of those who push back.

Break

*SEE ALSO: In Al Franken's new career, the comedy can sometimes write itself. Like, for instance, when the senator looks at the way folks like Minnery twist surveys: FRANKEN DESTOYS FOCUS ON THE FAMILY WITNESS, EXPOSES MISUSE OF HHS STUDY [TP]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails