RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


Tom Minnery, you were wrong

by Jeremy Hooper

When it comes to yesterday's DOMA testimony, Focus on the Family's Tom Minnery is predictably defiant:

Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., focused on Minnery’s written testimony, targeting one of more than 60 academic citations concerning the positive impact when children have a married mother and father in the home. Franken said he interprets one study’s definition of “nuclear family” as one that would include same-sex married couples with children.

Minnery replied after the hearing, “A careful reading of the study gives no indication that same-sex couples were included; it’s simply silent on the subject. Based on the actual text of the report, a realistic assessment is that silence means absence. This study is one small part the mountain of solid data that demonstrates kids do best with a married mother and father.”

Senate Hearing Focuses on Repealing Marriage Law [Focus on the Family]

Fortunately, the American public is probably going to side with someone who has little more firsthand insight. Some like, maybe, oh, I don't know -- the study's author:

“Sen. Franken is right,” the lead author of the study told POLITICO. The survey did not exclude same-sex couples, said Debra L. Blackwell, Ph.D., nor did it exclude them from the “nuclear family” category provided their family met the study’s definition.

The study’s definition of nuclear family is: “one or more children living with two parents who are married to one another and are each biological or adoptive parents of all the children in the family.”

That means the study does not provide evidence that straight couples’ children necessarily fare better than same-sex couples’ kids, as Minnery claimed.

Al Franken clashes with Focus on the Family executive [Politico]

The truth is that Tom Minnery got called out publicly. For years, those of us who follow this silly "culture war" have picked apart and pushed Lies And The Lying Liarsback, our jaws dropping over the "values" crowd's willingness to say whatever they think will best serve their own agenda, paired with a deeply-ingrained unwillingness to ever admit they got something wrong. Yesterday was one of the first times (if not the first time) we've seen a sitting Senator bring this duplicity front and center. It was a beautiful thing, frankly. And not for just this one incident, but for the years of false facts that have defined the anti-gay advocacy of groups like Focus on the Family.


*SEE ALSO: Lawrence O'Donnell's take

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails