RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/15/2011

Video/Audio: In May, Bachmann saw anti-gay advocacy as boon; temps now warmed, why are feet now cold?

by Jeremy Hooper

So Michele Bachman doesn't want to address the gay-themed "culture war" issue that is currently dominating our news cycle. Here's the AP on that:

The campaign's not taking interviews on the subject? Uh huh, well here's the thing: Michele Bachman has not only carved out her entire national presence on anti-gay/"ex-gay" nonsense -- she has actually cited her staunch convictions as a way of lending credence to her presidential campaign! Here's the Congresswoman speaking to the American Family Association's Dan Celia in May of this year, specifically citing her push for a Minnesota gay marriage ban as proof that she has more mettle than her fellow Republicans:


SOURCE: Financial Issues with Dan Celia [AFA]

So wait, which is it? Are these "culture war" issues the thing of presidential strength, or the thing of distraction, as the candidate now claims? I mean she certainly sounded confident when she called the "sexual dysfunction" of gayness "part of Satan, I think." She was surely eager to use her office's letterhead when she was accusing MN senators who didn't vote for her marriage amendment of acting like soldiers whose complacency led to the Pearl Harbor tragedy. She was certainly proud to provide a blurb for "ex-gay" Janet Boyne's book. She refers to Marcus' counseling offices as "the family business." And as evidenced above: When faced with a question of leadership, Rep. Bachmann is all about highlighting her own efforts to ban her home state's gays.

Not talking now, Congresswoman? Well that's not just offensive to LGBT people who deserve answers, but also to supporters who deserve some sort of consistency.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails