RECENT  POSTS:  » READ: Very anti-gay crew vows to never recognize civil marriage equality (even though they so will or face penalties) » NOM #March4Marriage coalition partner, religious liaison: 'Homosexuality is behavior and choice...immoral' » Mike Huckabee blatantly lies about something no civil marriage activist is seeking » Video: Man who once called for ban on gay teachers promotes #March4Marriage; because of course he does » FRC Senior Fellow: We are prepared to 'give our lives' to fight same-sex marriage (i.e. 'our eternal destruction') » Questions 'Face The Nation' should ask Tony Perkins (but likely won't, sadly) » Gorgeous clip from PFLAG Canada recognizes the many marriage memories that never were » On marriage, FRC prays SCOTUS will 'rule in the fear of the Lord' » AFA's new desperation: Marriage equality will turn bible into 'Mein Kampf' » Stop me if you've heard this one: Gay men throw reception for Ted Cruz; Cruz doesn't act as super anti-gay as usual  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/12/2011

After years of licensing any kind of straight duo sans morality test, another NY town clerk decides now is time for one

by Jeremy Hooper

Another NY town clerk is reportedly seeking a special exception regarding the duties of her job. The Citizen reports:

A town clerk in Cayuga County has informed her town board that because of her religious beliefs, she does not believe she can sign marriage licenses for same-sex couples, according to a member of the board.

Ledyard Town Clerk Rose Marie Belforti submitted a letter to the Ledyard Town Board saying that her religious beliefs prevented her from signing marriage licenses for same-sex couples and the board discussed Belforti’s letter at Monday’s meeting, according to John Binns, a member of the town board.

When reached for comment Thursday, Belforti said “that’s not your business” before hanging up the phone

Keep reading: Ledyard clerk won’t sign gay marriage licenses [AuburnPub.com]

"Not your business"? Well actually, if a government employee is questioning a state law and her "right" to both ignore it and maintain that same taxpayer-funded employment, then yes -- it is every one's Screen Shot 2011-08-12 At 12.42.01 Pmbusiness. Every New Yorker's business, in particular.

But honestly, I don't think these things are going to get much more play. Polls consistently show New Yorkers in support of the marriage law, Americans basically undertstand the concept of church and state spearation, and most people quite fully understand that employment -- any employment -- comes with prescribed duties. New York's increasingly option-deprived opposition groups seized on this proposed martyrdom early and loudly because it seemed like a possibily playable card in tune with our times. They miscalculated.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails