RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/11/2011

Jury of *their* peers: Social cons against gays giving gay-centric verdicts

by Jeremy Hooper

We've seen the social conservatives go after openly-gay judges who preside over cases involving constitutional fairness for LGBT people. Now a new target: Gay jurors:

"There are a million reasons why someone might want to not include someone who is a practicing homosexual from a jury, especially [from a case] that has to do with homosexuality," the MassResistance spokesman [Brian Camenker] points out. "This is very dangerous, I think."
At issue: 'Gay' jurors [One News Now]

So once again, we have a social conservative -- in this case a head of a SPLC "hate group", speaking to an outlet run by an SPLC "hate group" -- quite unapologetically suggesting that only Brian-Camenkerheterosexual people have the right to hear and decide on matters pertaining to LGBT people. Never mind that heterosexual jurors here straight-related cases every second of every day. Never mind that any LGBT person's body of peers most likely does include other LGBT people. Never mind that anti-equality voices like Camenker have no problem with bias motivations against LGBT people entering a jury pool, with them surely seeing themselves as completely fit to give a verdict in such cases. The heterosexist/LGBT-hostile goal is to shut out LGBT opinions from every facet of life. Period. The jury's not out on that point.

These are the kind of overplayed, parentally un-American hands that will win us this "culture war."

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails