RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/29/2011

NOM defines 'bigot'; Unfortunately for NOM, Webster's still defines accuracy

by Jeremy Hooper

Over on the National Organization For Marriage's Facebook wall, staffers are running this definition of "bigot":

Screen Shot 2011-08-29 At 5.59.21 Pm
[SOURCE: NOM Facebook]

Which is fine. Whatever. With six states and the nation's capital on board with us, we in the true pro-marriage movement will keep our eye on what matters:

201108291811

Let NOM have the labels. I'll take my rights, peace of mind, and a smart cocktail (not necessarily in that order).

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails