RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/03/2011

Our parking we want validated. But for our marriages: we demand equality!

by Jeremy Hooper

More and more, this is becoming the anti-equality far-right's most in-play talking point:

"[A]s odd as it may sound, the campaign to redefine marriage isn't primarily about marriage. Rather, it's about the desire of same-sex couples to have their relationships validated; to have them free from criticism, state-generated or otherwise. That's the key to understanding the fight for marriage. Marriage, to those who would redefine it, is simply a means to an end, not an end in itself."

"If advocates for redefining marriage are successful, they won't stop at marriage. They won't stop until their opposition is either converted or silenced."

-Alliance Defense Fund attorney Dale Schowengerdt, writing for Baptist Press

The same exact claim we just saw from New York's Jason McGuire: The one that crudely takes same-sex couples and their fight to protect their families and reduces it to nothing more than a search for "validation." It's of course always coupled with condemnation, since animus most always accompanies this form of civil bias (at least with the organized movement, as opposed to duped folks who buy into it). But this accusation is almost more offensive than simple homo-hostility, since it doesn't just stop at branding gay people as "wrong" or "immoral" or "broken" or "changeable," but also tacks on a "bad citizenship" charge.

I suspect we'll keep seeing this kind of claim as we head into the next phase of this post-New York marriage world, as it simply builds on the same sense of fear that has guided our opposition movement's every "marriage protective" step. So it's important for us to show America that this "slippery slope" is only slick because certain people keep turning the hose on our lives and loves!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails