RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism » The 'why can't they take their business elsewhere?' line: Not only offensive but legally meaningless » FRC's ridiculously bunk new poll (*from partisan polling firm) » Video: 'Vice' covers the sad, dangerous, discredited world of 'conversion therapy' » Buzzfeed: Jeb Bush's nascent team is teeming with gay Republicans » FRC prays against gay acceptance to 'avoid the wrath of God' » Video: Mark Cuban supports religious biz owners that 'just say no' to serving same-sex weddings » We're not driven by animus, say groups that are known for showing animus toward gay couples » Video: Onetime LGBT community foe delivers crushing blow to 'religious freedom' (a.k.a. license to discriminate) bills » Q. How does Mark Regnerus 'prove' he's not an anti-gay activist?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/05/2011

Right Knight says inclusive service will wreck military; Enlightened day to have final say

by Jeremy Hooper

6A00D8341C503453Ef0147E10D05B8970BLongtime conservative Robert Knight on Don't Ask Don't Tell repeal:

"This is huge. This could have generational impact..And it can't stand. It will wreck our military. People of good conscience will have to leave the military and in fact many have already said they're going to."
[One News Now]

Well yeah, hopefully it'll have a generational impact. Multi-generational, in fact. That's sorta the point: To foster a world where banning LGBT service members will be seen as the ridiculous notion here, not the idea that certain worthy candidates have the ability to wreck a powerful military by virtue of their attractions.

And what's with these social conservatives' constant mischaracterizations of our fighting forces' wherewithal? I mean honestly: If repealing the flawed DADT policy is enough to wreck our military, then we have way more serious problems than just Sergeant Bob's sexuality. Why must Robert Knight portray our servicemembers as a weak, homo-hostile monolith whose grasp on sustainability is so tenuous, that the possibility of more recruits is threatening to the point of extinction? Isn't that the truly offensive idea in play?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails