RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM affiliate group to give Roy Moore a 'Letter from Birmingham Jail Award' » Save the Date: SCOTUS to hear history-making marriage cases on April 28 » Wall Street's biggest put stock in equal bonds » Gross: Tony Perkins makes some sort of 'ugly baby' joke at Hillary Clinton's expense » Really, suddenly contrite Ben Carson? Because you were pretty cocksure before! » ADF links A-Rod's drug suspension with florist's anti-gay discrimination; huh?! » NOM: Marriage means putting choking hazards on your baby's toes » Video: Ben Carson is apparently one felony conviction away from fellating a man » NOM to gay families: Your relationships are 'simply about adult sexual desires' » Maggie Gallagher's new gig  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/06/2011

Actions, words: A friendly reminder about which speak louder

by Jeremy Hooper

At times in this whole fight over LGBT peace, it's not actually the less-than-accepting actions or beliefs themselves that are most annoying, but rather the responsibility-shirking justifications that the folks on the other side use to clean their consciousnesses. These snippets come from Baptist Press:

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (BP) -- Psalm 100, a Christian a cappella group at the University of North Carolina, struck a few dissonant chords around the Chapel Hill campus as school started when its members voted to expel a fellow singer because of his views on homosexuality.

The decision to remove openly gay student Will Thomason sparked a backlash against the group and prompted school officials to launch an anti-discrimination investigation.
...
Blake Templeton, general director of the group, said the Aug. 28 decision was tough, especially because so many people thought it was done out of hatred.

"That's so far from the truth," he said. "I want the power of God's love to be so, so clear."

Templeton stressed that the group made its decision out of love for Thomason.
...
Templeton said the university approved Psalm 100's original constitution, which allows its decisions to be made based on the Bible. And he stressed that it was Thomason's disagreement with the group's constitution, not his sexuality, that got him kicked out.
Christian group expels gay man, gets investigated [Baptist Press]

In this case, I'm not even going to weigh in on whether the club has the right to boot, as I trust the university and its students to have that appropriate debate (more on that here). To me, the more compelling conversation for national LGBT activists is the one pertaining to the anti-equality voice, big and small, and the remarkable consistency with which said voice can rail off some sort of flowery prose in order to validate a crappy actuality he or she created for a fellow human being. This rhetorical spin is an overarching through line in this LGBT rights conversation, one that so often stands in the way of true discussion.

Booting a kid from a singing group simply because said kid was too gay/pro-gay, then to say you did so "out of love"? It's the kind of line that could only exist in absurdist plays, tip sheets on how to escape hand-in-cookie-jar status, or socially conservative "culture wars." Oh, and also the kind of unfair justification that needs to be called out whenever and wherever it exists, so that maybe we can start having a grown up debate on the concrete merits of (non)discrimination rather than circuitous discussions on the level of abstract love that may or may not surround a particular act of enmity.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails