RECENT  POSTS:  » Your anti-LGBT movement at work: Viciously denigrating stock photos of gay families » Maggie Gallagher's latest shows what a disservice she did to the *civil* marriage debate » Brian Brown apparently buying a new dinette set, misapplies purchase to marriage debate » Focus on the Family: Marriage equality activists are 'tyrants'; opponents are 'slaves' » Read: Zack Ford smacks back Ryan Anderson's love of tax-subsidized discrimination » God Hates Fads: Radical Bay State group pretends homosexuality is like skinny jeans » But does the Archbishop even believe in gay? » Video: Move over aliens, plagues, Sharknados—it's committed gays who'll soon kill Western Civilization » Nine former water-carriers for 'ex-gayness' join all credible scientists in denouncing 'ex-gay' propaganda » The operative word is 'yet'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/13/2011

If marriage is such a big factor in NY-9...

by Jeremy Hooper

…then why doesn't state Assemblyman Dov Hikind -- a man who is on record likening same-sex marriage to incest and who is featured in the National Organization For Marriage's mailers -- mention the issue even once in his official campaign robocall?

Why not? Because as stated in the last post: The "it's all about marriage" contingent is small, largely manufactured, niche. Hyper-motivated and wringing every last ounce of that "just enough" power, yes. But the marriage factor is not the major issue that NOM wants it to be. Not with most New Yorkers its not.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails