RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/15/2011

NOM EXPOSED: Against, not for: How NY-9 belies NOM's positive image

by Jeremy Hooper
6A00D8341C503453Ef0154349F168B970C-13NOM is continuing to tout the organization's largest-ever expenditure campaign ever and its supposed success in electing Republican Bob Turner over Democrat David Weprin in New York's 9th Congressional District. I've already looked at that in depth, so I won't rehash the most salient points of the marriage factor and its supposed role. However, I do want to look at the expenditure itself and see what, exactly, NOM was seeking/breeding with this campaign.

KEEP READING: Against, not for: How NY-9 belies NOM's positive image [NOM Exposed]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails