RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism » The 'why can't they take their business elsewhere?' line: Not only offensive but legally meaningless » FRC's ridiculously bunk new poll (*from partisan polling firm) » Video: 'Vice' covers the sad, dangerous, discredited world of 'conversion therapy' » Buzzfeed: Jeb Bush's nascent team is teeming with gay Republicans » FRC prays against gay acceptance to 'avoid the wrath of God' » Video: Mark Cuban supports religious biz owners that 'just say no' to serving same-sex weddings » We're not driven by animus, say groups that are known for showing animus toward gay couples » Video: Onetime LGBT community foe delivers crushing blow to 'religious freedom' (a.k.a. license to discriminate) bills » Q. How does Mark Regnerus 'prove' he's not an anti-gay activist?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/15/2011

NOM EXPOSED: Against, not for: How NY-9 belies NOM's positive image

by Jeremy Hooper
6A00D8341C503453Ef0154349F168B970C-13NOM is continuing to tout the organization's largest-ever expenditure campaign ever and its supposed success in electing Republican Bob Turner over Democrat David Weprin in New York's 9th Congressional District. I've already looked at that in depth, so I won't rehash the most salient points of the marriage factor and its supposed role. However, I do want to look at the expenditure itself and see what, exactly, NOM was seeking/breeding with this campaign.

KEEP READING: Against, not for: How NY-9 belies NOM's positive image [NOM Exposed]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails