RECENT  POSTS:  » 'Ex-gay' org. excited to be 'featured exhibitor' at #VVS14 » Three of history's four women Supreme Court Justices have now performed same-sex weddings » GLAAD: Questions we'd like reporters to ask at the Values Voter Summit » HA! Robert Oscar Lopez mentions me in truly bizarre amicus brief to 5th Circuit » Gay man realizes he shouldn't have entered an opposite-sex union—so no same-sex marriage for anyone?! » Your daily 'Gay Gestapo' moment with the American Family Association's senior analyst » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/15/2011

NOM EXPOSED: Against, not for: How NY-9 belies NOM's positive image

by Jeremy Hooper
6A00D8341C503453Ef0154349F168B970C-13NOM is continuing to tout the organization's largest-ever expenditure campaign ever and its supposed success in electing Republican Bob Turner over Democrat David Weprin in New York's 9th Congressional District. I've already looked at that in depth, so I won't rehash the most salient points of the marriage factor and its supposed role. However, I do want to look at the expenditure itself and see what, exactly, NOM was seeking/breeding with this campaign.

KEEP READING: Against, not for: How NY-9 belies NOM's positive image [NOM Exposed]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails