RECENT  POSTS:  » Jodie Foster in 2013: 'I am'; Jodie Foster in 2014: 'I do' » AFA promotes its new app in only way it knows how » Robert Oscar Lopez says I perform 'psychological operations routine' on him when I quote his own words from his own web site » Matt Barber's ever-classy site suggests gay people are literally crushing fellow humans » Bryan Fischer is on to our comic book villain–in-chief » Southern Baptist Theological Seminary's Al Mohler 'can't give' us acceptance; good thing we're not asking » NOM fails to trip up Oregon marriage case » Audio: Tony Perkins equates opposing equality with opposing Nazis » 'WaPo' conservative columnist: 'Strident' marriage equality opponents have lost » If you feel like you hear about another marriage case every day, here's why  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/15/2011

NOM EXPOSED: Against, not for: How NY-9 belies NOM's positive image

by Jeremy Hooper
6A00D8341C503453Ef0154349F168B970C-13NOM is continuing to tout the organization's largest-ever expenditure campaign ever and its supposed success in electing Republican Bob Turner over Democrat David Weprin in New York's 9th Congressional District. I've already looked at that in depth, so I won't rehash the most salient points of the marriage factor and its supposed role. However, I do want to look at the expenditure itself and see what, exactly, NOM was seeking/breeding with this campaign.

KEEP READING: Against, not for: How NY-9 belies NOM's positive image [NOM Exposed]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails