RECENT  POSTS:  » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/01/2011

NOM's 100k challenge: That 'generous donor' need only be moderately charitable

by Jeremy Hooper

Today is September 1st, so that means the National Organization For Marriage's much touted "$100K Challenge" is over and done. So how'd the anti-equality group do? Let's look at the final tallies.

First the numbers as they stood on day one, 7/24:


And now, as of 6:35AM (ET) here on 9/1:

Screen Shot 2011-09-01 At 6.31.20 Am-1
Screen Shot 2011-09-01 At 6.31.04 Am-1

That means (drum roll): 931 Facebook likes and 298 new Twitter followers. At NOM's announced rate of one buck for one like/follow, that's a total of $1229 dollars for the marriage discrimination's costly coffers. Which is crazy short of the $100,000 goal, despite multiple please via email, Youtube, NOM blog, etc. Deliciously short, in fact.

Now, I should say, they also accepted submissions via SMS messaging, so there could be a small wad of cash there. But $98,771 more? I'm thinking not. I'm thinking only a couple hundred of rights-grabbing texters (for the reasons mentioned here), if being generous.

So how do we transpose this now-apparent inability to organize onto marriage amendment ballot campaigns? We have more than 100K reasons to figure it out. And our challenge doesn't require an anonymous donor, only committed supporters of peace.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails