RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/08/2011

Roback Morse vs. the 'Beautiful People'

by Jeremy Hooper

Partisan, populist fiction:

Roback-Morse"A handful of rich people, of whom Rob Reiner is the most visible, is working to undermine a perfectly valid election, that tens of thousands of people actively participated in. The Prop 8 election wasn’t even a close call. The Little People feel very strongly that they are being given the finger by the Beautiful People, the rich and powerful elites of this country.

And yes, it is fair to call Hollywood people the “Beautiful people,” regardless of their personal appearance. You know exactly what I’m talking about. The Hollywood literati, the media elites, the academics and journalists: they are like the “in-Crowd” in junior high school, who think they can be mean and bully everyone else. People are fed up with the Life-Style Left, and the Left generally.

So I ask my Friewis: (Friends with Wrong ideas) Are these really your kind of people? Do you really want to associate yourselves with the Hollywood big wigs? What ever happened to looking out for the Little Guy?"


-Jennifer Roback Morse of National Organization For Marriage's Ruth Institute

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight. The "little guy" in the heterosexual, largely Christian majority. That's really who's been suffering the cruel bullying in this country, waged by a politically-minded director and his socially conscious friends. Mmm Hmm. Sure, J Ro Mo.

But I just want to ask my Friewlstacbaromichhonctaabf (Friend with Labels She Thinks are Cute But Are Really Only More Insulting Considering Her History of Nasty Comments That Are Anything But Friendly): If banning a valid minority from a deserved civil rights constitutes "looking out for the little guy," then where does that leave the millions of gays who are left deprived by the push? Because while I know that in the socially conservative fiction books, all LGBT people are riding high on a golden pony, sipping Cristal out of the communion cups they've forcibly seized from the nation's churches, I also know that in the LGBT reality I experience every day, the big, "Beautiful" stereotypes are belied by everyday actualities. You know: The very everyday realities (bullying, family strife, unfair tax burdens, denied health benefits, overburdened custody battles, religious animus, etc.) that folks like Roback Morse must overlook if they are to claim the moral high ground.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails