RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: AFA's Fischer urges FLOTUS to fight obesity by fighting lesbians' sexual orientation » Um, but he lost to another pro-equality candidate, Tony » Video: Man misapplies personal trauma to sexual orientation science » WND's editor fundamentally misunderstands nondiscrimination law (part 3 of 3) » Video: Why is this shockingly anti-gay (among other things) speech happening in a Connecticut public school? » Fined NY event space to host same-sex wedding receptions (*but no ceremonies for anyone) » Another day, another far-right pastor pushing Christians to civil war » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/07/2011

Stock questions for the 'Stop SB48' campaign

by Jeremy Hooper

FACT: The campaign to overturn LGBT-inclusive education in California schools is clearly a controversial effort.

FACT: As per usual with anti-equality campaigns, this "Stop SB48" effort is using a stock photo family to represent actual California citizens:

Stopsb48-Sign-Legal-Size3

FACT: This stock photo comes from FotoSearch:

Screen Shot 2011-09-07 At 9.38.57 Am
Stock Photo - Family Walking on the Beach [FotoSearch]

FACT: FotoSearch includes this restriction in the license agreement associated with the image in question:

3. Restrictions
3.5 If any Licensed Material featuring a model or property is used in connection with a subject that would be unflattering or unduly controversial to a reasonable person, Licensee must accompany each such use with a statement that indicates that: (i) the Licensed Material is being used for illustrative purposes only; and (ii) any person depicted in the Licensed Material, if any, is a model."

License Agreement [FotoSearch Gold]

FACT: Nothing on the unduly controversial StopSB48.com website or on any of the group's promotional materials (all of which use this same family) contain any sort of disclaimer about the family being made up of models.


QUESTION: If this StopSB48 coalition has the will to make public schools less fair, shouldn't they at least have the fortitude to put their own visual stamp on the effort?

QUESTION: If coalition members won't stand up and be shown, don't they have a responsibility to make the visual outsourcing known?

QUESTION: Don't Californians deserve to know that crucial decisions affecting their state's families and children are being fronted by families (maybe Californian, maybe not) who were paid to smile for the camera?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails