RECENT  POSTS:  » 'Indianapolis Star' to Governor Pence: FIX THIS NOW » Bill Maher's monologue on dialogue he'd prefer remain a monologue » Video: Even Michael Steele thinks Indiana law is too broad; Ryan T. Anderson constantly interrupts, still loses » Watch Gov. Pence heap praise on lobbying group that admitted #SB101 was all about same-sex marriage » Shellshocked Gov. Pence in full-blown spin mode » Video: Man who's called for exporting gays goes on CNN to defend Indiana law, earns deserved result » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/17/2011

Cain says he wouldn't support an FMA; I don't believe him

by Jeremy Hooper

Just this weekend on "Meet The Press," sudden GOP frontrunner Herman Cain expressed his opposition to seeking a constitutional marriage ban:

But not only does that go against what Maggie Gallagher claims Cain told her in private, but also goes against what Cain himself said back when the subject of an FMA was in its real world, Bush era form:

Screen Shot 2011-10-17 At 4.24.52 Pm
Screen Shot 2011-10-17 At 4.25.17 Pm
[HermanCain.com -- Internet Archive, 2004]

In fact, Cain even ran for the U.S. Senate that year with a radio ad that drummed up this same FMA fervor.

So the question: Why should voters trust him on what he says now? If he's going around telling Maggie in private that he could get behind an FMA, and if he was an ardent supporter back when such a measure seemed plausible, why wouldn't be believe that a theoretical President Cain would get behind a similar effort to tarnish the U.S. Constitution circa 2013? Because what, did his opinion on the Founding Fathers change that much in seven years? Or did he have a change of heart leading him or realize loving gay couples actually aren't like compass-less ships, so therefor not in need of federal harpooning? I mean, seriously -- what changed from the Cain that used exclamation points in 2004 to the Cain who wants to seem more moderate, other than the polling?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails