RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/17/2011

Cain says he wouldn't support an FMA; I don't believe him

by Jeremy Hooper

Just this weekend on "Meet The Press," sudden GOP frontrunner Herman Cain expressed his opposition to seeking a constitutional marriage ban:

But not only does that go against what Maggie Gallagher claims Cain told her in private, but also goes against what Cain himself said back when the subject of an FMA was in its real world, Bush era form:

Screen Shot 2011-10-17 At 4.24.52 Pm
Screen Shot 2011-10-17 At 4.25.17 Pm
[HermanCain.com -- Internet Archive, 2004]

In fact, Cain even ran for the U.S. Senate that year with a radio ad that drummed up this same FMA fervor.

So the question: Why should voters trust him on what he says now? If he's going around telling Maggie in private that he could get behind an FMA, and if he was an ardent supporter back when such a measure seemed plausible, why wouldn't be believe that a theoretical President Cain would get behind a similar effort to tarnish the U.S. Constitution circa 2013? Because what, did his opinion on the Founding Fathers change that much in seven years? Or did he have a change of heart leading him or realize loving gay couples actually aren't like compass-less ships, so therefor not in need of federal harpooning? I mean, seriously -- what changed from the Cain that used exclamation points in 2004 to the Cain who wants to seem more moderate, other than the polling?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails