RECENT  POSTS:  » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/10/2011

Discrimination betters nation, says NC 'family' head; 'That's never happened before,' says history

by Jeremy Hooper

Anti-gay marriage amendments are like a lullaby that will put to bed any state's marriage issue once and for all. Or so intimates a man who is trying to push one into his own state's constitution:

"After a Marriage Protection Amendment is placed in the Constitution, a more orderly civil society can ensue. This has been the case in states that already have a constitutional amendment in place. States that do not have this protection have an area of unsettled law, where a court or legislative body can intervene at any time to introduce the rancor and division that has come in every state that has gone down the path towards marriage redefinition."

-Bill Brooks, head of the North Carolina Family Policy Council

REALITY: Marriage amendments are mean-spirited, divisive, and ultimately destined to wither in every state where they have been enacted. They do not "settle" anything -- they only add years and countless dollars to a fight that will ultimately bend towards justice, since common sense tells us that equality activists in a nation with six marriage equality states (+ D.C.) are never going to accept a reverse in this growing course. That's a promise.

The marriage amendments will all be left in the annals of ill-advised history, ultimately. And when that happens, it will be up to people like Bill Brooks to explain why his movement wasted energy, resources, and goodwill on measures that wouldn't be able to sustain the ultimate tests. I don't know if the "protect marriage" movement's inability to provide such justification will create rancor and division with the "values voters" ranks. But I do know that those of us who value peace of mind and the American sense of equality will no longer care. Happily.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails