RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/14/2011

NOM Document dump: Anything to see here?

by Jeremy Hooper

Nomexposed-1

So last night, while poking around the public records hosted on the West Virginia Secretary State's website (because who doesn't do that on a Thursday evening?), I came across a large collection of documents, uploaded between December of 2010 and April of this year, all involving the National Organization For Marriage, its "Educational Fund" (i.e. The Ruth Institute), and its contracts with outside vendors (most notably the very conservative American Philanthopic). Not sure what's all there, but I am seeing some new names, connections, and information that I felt was pertinent to keep on file as we continue to expose NOM.

One potentially interesting line to follow: Some of these documents are identical to paperwork filed by Virginia Thomas (wife of SCOTUS justice Clarence Thomas), with the very same team -- accountant Neil Corkery, CPA Thomas Conlon, etc - in place at both NOM and Thomas Liberty central group. Potentially interesting, as this shows how deep and strong the ties between NOM and the larger conservative movement. Maybe even Koch money? Interesting pontificating on that very subject can be found here.

See what else you find interesting:

6870-FC-2010-04-09-006864525
6870-RG-2010-04-09-006864517-1
6870-IA-2010-04-09-006864522-1
2011-02-04-16-00-51-CHO-khill-FIL-RG
2011-02-04-16-03-04-CHO-khill-FIL-IA
2011-04-08-14-28-08-838-CHO-scanuser-FIL-IA
2011-02-04-16-03-38-CHO-khill-FIL-FC
2011-04-08-14-26-47-827-CHO-scanuser-FIL-RN-1
6870-FC-2010-04-09-006864523
6870-CL-2010-04-09-006864516
2011-01-05-09-51-52-CHO-khill-FIL-FC
2011-02-04-16-03-19-CHO-khill-FIL-FC
2011-02-04-16-00-08-CHO-khill-FIL-CL
2011-03-10-11-14-41-CHO-scanuser-FIL-FC

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails