RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/21/2011

NOM's Thomas Peters: Opposing marriage bans constitutes 'evil'; homosexuality 'hurts the human person'

by Jeremy Hooper

Since National Organization For Marriage president Brian Brown is insistent that we are going to "hear a lot more about [NOM employee Thomas Peters] in the coming weeks and months," it might be a good time to look back at what young Thomas put on record in the past. Here are just two comments that should give you even more insight into how Thomas, the "gays should be celibate"-emboldening, "ex-gay"-pushing, "fake Catholic"-branding, "lifestyle"-quipping NOM strategist and blog writer, will be stewarding the organization in the period of time laid out by his boss' prediction.

First up: Thomas invalidating Google's "don't be evil mantra," simply because the California-based company opposed the highly discriminatory Prop 8:

201110211256

Next up: This take on why schools should stand against LGBT organizations on campus:

201110211257
*SOURCE for both: [American Papist via Archive.org]

Not sure, but I think that sounds like it runs much deeper than just "protecting marriage." And I'm sure the voters in states like North Carolina, Minnesota, and Iowa would certainly see NOM in a different light, should the organization and its staffers be so honest when they work to influence those states' (and all other) races!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails