RECENT  POSTS:  » CA Republicans of 2015 do thing that will make CA Republicans of 2025 say, 'Yeah. Okay. so?' » NC activists choose name that sounds like Lifetime movie, plot that's discriminatory » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism » The 'why can't they take their business elsewhere?' line: Not only offensive but legally meaningless » FRC's ridiculously bunk new poll (*from partisan polling firm) » Video: 'Vice' covers the sad, dangerous, discredited world of 'conversion therapy' » Buzzfeed: Jeb Bush's nascent team is teeming with gay Republicans » FRC prays against gay acceptance to 'avoid the wrath of God' » Video: Mark Cuban supports religious biz owners that 'just say no' to serving same-sex weddings » We're not driven by animus, say groups that are known for showing animus toward gay couples  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/21/2011

NOM's Thomas Peters: Opposing marriage bans constitutes 'evil'; homosexuality 'hurts the human person'

by Jeremy Hooper

Since National Organization For Marriage president Brian Brown is insistent that we are going to "hear a lot more about [NOM employee Thomas Peters] in the coming weeks and months," it might be a good time to look back at what young Thomas put on record in the past. Here are just two comments that should give you even more insight into how Thomas, the "gays should be celibate"-emboldening, "ex-gay"-pushing, "fake Catholic"-branding, "lifestyle"-quipping NOM strategist and blog writer, will be stewarding the organization in the period of time laid out by his boss' prediction.

First up: Thomas invalidating Google's "don't be evil mantra," simply because the California-based company opposed the highly discriminatory Prop 8:

201110211256

Next up: This take on why schools should stand against LGBT organizations on campus:

201110211257
*SOURCE for both: [American Papist via Archive.org]

Not sure, but I think that sounds like it runs much deeper than just "protecting marriage." And I'm sure the voters in states like North Carolina, Minnesota, and Iowa would certainly see NOM in a different light, should the organization and its staffers be so honest when they work to influence those states' (and all other) races!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails