RECENT  POSTS:  » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/21/2011

NOM's Thomas Peters: Opposing marriage bans constitutes 'evil'; homosexuality 'hurts the human person'

by Jeremy Hooper

Since National Organization For Marriage president Brian Brown is insistent that we are going to "hear a lot more about [NOM employee Thomas Peters] in the coming weeks and months," it might be a good time to look back at what young Thomas put on record in the past. Here are just two comments that should give you even more insight into how Thomas, the "gays should be celibate"-emboldening, "ex-gay"-pushing, "fake Catholic"-branding, "lifestyle"-quipping NOM strategist and blog writer, will be stewarding the organization in the period of time laid out by his boss' prediction.

First up: Thomas invalidating Google's "don't be evil mantra," simply because the California-based company opposed the highly discriminatory Prop 8:

201110211256

Next up: This take on why schools should stand against LGBT organizations on campus:

201110211257
*SOURCE for both: [American Papist via Archive.org]

Not sure, but I think that sounds like it runs much deeper than just "protecting marriage." And I'm sure the voters in states like North Carolina, Minnesota, and Iowa would certainly see NOM in a different light, should the organization and its staffers be so honest when they work to influence those states' (and all other) races!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails