RECENT  POSTS:  » READ: Very anti-gay crew vows to never recognize civil marriage equality (even though they so will or face penalties) » NOM #March4Marriage coalition partner, religious liaison: 'Homosexuality is behavior and choice...immoral' » Mike Huckabee blatantly lies about something no civil marriage activist is seeking » Video: Man who once called for ban on gay teachers promotes #March4Marriage; because of course he does » FRC Senior Fellow: We are prepared to 'give our lives' to fight same-sex marriage (i.e. 'our eternal destruction') » Questions 'Face The Nation' should ask Tony Perkins (but likely won't, sadly) » Gorgeous clip from PFLAG Canada recognizes the many marriage memories that never were » On marriage, FRC prays SCOTUS will 'rule in the fear of the Lord' » AFA's new desperation: Marriage equality will turn bible into 'Mein Kampf' » Stop me if you've heard this one: Gay men throw reception for Ted Cruz; Cruz doesn't act as super anti-gay as usual  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/10/2011

Bitter apples threaten two different branches

by Jeremy Hooper

Are judges and legislators the same thing, both tasked with doing what's popular before doing what's right? In NOM world they are:

NOM also pledged to make the repeal of DOMA a major issue in US Senate elections next year. "Dianne Feinstein is leading her Democratic colleagues off a political cliff," Brown said. "Any Senator who votes for this legislation is going to be held accountable to voters back home. Just ask the three Supreme Court justices from Iowa who imposed same-sex marriage what happens when elitists face voters after ignoring their wishes on marriage. NOM worked to ensure that when they faced voters afterwards, all three were removed from office - and all three justices were removed.

Now personally, I want my supported lawmakers always putting principle before popularity, and I hope I support those who do that more often than not. But I also understand the nature of the game. So as far as the political game goes, I don't have a problem with NOM threatening U.S. Senators with retributive votes, as idle or as unprincipled as those threats may be.

However, I have a HUUUUGE problem with acting as if a legislator and a judge are one and the same, both fit to be punished on highly partisan, largely faith-based ideological grounds! I was jaw-dropped at the way NOM and cohorts flooded Iowa with out-of-state cash to end judges' careers on the basis of one MAJORITY opinion, and I remain stunned by the arrogance a year later. Not surprised, mind you, for a number of reasons I highlighted here. But certainly stunned that the NOM crowd cared so little about our independent judiciary that they turned it into an adult-sized Student Council election. A particularly "Mean Girl" form of a Student Council election, even.

Though knowing what we know about NOM's "win at all costs" worldview, it's extremely telling that Brian Brown so easily transposes the nature of electoral politics, as if "the people" get to bully back any person in any kind of governmental role who commits the crime of not agreeing with their organizationally-held worldview. As telling as it is dangerous!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails