RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/08/2011

Except for the 'show' and 'sex' part

by Jeremy Hooper

From the conservative Media Research Center/Culture and Media Institute:

Screen Shot 2011-11-08 At 2.32.48 Pm
"will feature a gay couple having sex on TV"
[SOURCE]

Oh please. They'd be more likely to show the autotune machine than show actual sex on broadcast TV. It's Fox, not Xtube.

But you keep drumming up those deceptive fears, kiddies. That's the way to impart maturity on young viewers.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails