RECENT  POSTS:  » 'WaPo' conservative columnist: 'Strident' marriage equality opponents have lost » If John Eastman's allowed to intervene in Oregon, I submit his endorsement of this very anti-gay book » I apparently can fly; cool, I've always wanted to! » Starving selves to stop others' happiness: Virginia edition » NOM-aligned organization claims God will soon punish us for pro-equality rulings » GLAAD: The rise of toxic terminology: Losing anti-LGBT movement turns to corrosive labeling » Founder of anti-gay Boy Scouts alternative links sexual orientation, adultery; earns merit badge in ill-intended comparisons » 'Playbill' to let the two previously unaware playgoers in on Broadway's love for gays » New record: Anti-gay activist Ralph Reed contradicts self in less than minute » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead)  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/09/2011

NOM's Cultural Director knowingly asked you to support a 'weak' candidate. Weak.

by Jeremy Hooper

Last night, just moments after we learned that Democrat Liz Mathis triumphed in her Iowa state Senate bid over the National Organization For Marriage's candidate, Republican Cindy Golding, NOM Cultural Director Thomas Peters tweeted the following about the GOP candidate:

Screen Shot 2011-11-09 At 7.28.54 Am

So wait: Thomas, whose organization tossed around $40,000 at the cause of electing Golding, calls the candidate "weak" just moments after the returns come in? Doesn't that say much more about NOM/Peters than it does Golding? I mean, Thomas tweeted it literally minutes after the Mathis victory was finalized, so it was clearly on his mind. And considering his high-ranking role -- Thomas spoke at a weekend event right alongside Maggie Gallagher -- he is presumably in on NOM discussions, so I'd even go on a limb and say this was at least a semi-common thought within the NOM culture itself. And yet they were still doing everything in their out-of-state power to influence this one hyper-local race? The cause of taking away Iowa's freedom to marry was so great that NOM was willing to tell locals that the "weak candidate"…

Screen Shot 2011-11-09 At 7.40.10 Am

…was the better choice?

I ask again: Doesn't this "weak" claim say much more about the NOM playbook than it does the unsuccessful candidate?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails