RECENT  POSTS:  » Omaha, NE, resident helps show America what unchecked homo-hostility looks like » Christian developer creates 'Kill The F*ggots' game; parents proven right about video games potentially rotting brains » WND readers: Marriage equality will either not affect us or end us completely » AFA: Gay rights = 'grave threat to our survival as a nation and as a moral and civilized people' » Tony Perkins: Baltimore unrest might be godly punishment for declaring 'moral rights to that which is morally wrong' » The oddity that is the LGBT rights debate circa 2015 » Video: 'Vox' lays out eleven year journey toward a bettered America » Why's the far-right putting a long discarded fear card back in the deck? » 'The newly stigmatized' Maggie Gallagher » Tony Perkins is denying he calls for pro-equality judges to be impeached; he's lying and here's empirical proof  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/09/2011

NOM's Cultural Director knowingly asked you to support a 'weak' candidate. Weak.

by Jeremy Hooper

Last night, just moments after we learned that Democrat Liz Mathis triumphed in her Iowa state Senate bid over the National Organization For Marriage's candidate, Republican Cindy Golding, NOM Cultural Director Thomas Peters tweeted the following about the GOP candidate:

Screen Shot 2011-11-09 At 7.28.54 Am

So wait: Thomas, whose organization tossed around $40,000 at the cause of electing Golding, calls the candidate "weak" just moments after the returns come in? Doesn't that say much more about NOM/Peters than it does Golding? I mean, Thomas tweeted it literally minutes after the Mathis victory was finalized, so it was clearly on his mind. And considering his high-ranking role -- Thomas spoke at a weekend event right alongside Maggie Gallagher -- he is presumably in on NOM discussions, so I'd even go on a limb and say this was at least a semi-common thought within the NOM culture itself. And yet they were still doing everything in their out-of-state power to influence this one hyper-local race? The cause of taking away Iowa's freedom to marry was so great that NOM was willing to tell locals that the "weak candidate"…

Screen Shot 2011-11-09 At 7.40.10 Am

…was the better choice?

I ask again: Doesn't this "weak" claim say much more about the NOM playbook than it does the unsuccessful candidate?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails