RECENT  POSTS:  » The oddity that is the LGBT rights debate circa 2015 » Video: 'Vox' lays out eleven year journey toward a bettered America » Why's the far-right putting a long discarded fear card back in the deck? » 'The newly stigmatized' Maggie Gallagher » Tony Perkins is denying he calls for pro-equality judges to be impeached; he's lying and here's empirical proof » Reality stars Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar vow to defy pro-equality SCTOUS ruling » Video: At US Capitol event hosted by GOP lawmakers, God's wrath over gay marriage explored as if it's likely » NOM: We're broke and need money before you see no reason to ever give to us again » The particularly strange regression in yesterday's #SCOTUS hearing » About Chief Justice Roberts' 'closing of debate can close minds' line  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/21/2011

Stepped in deep Dede: Newt apologizes for backing moderate, marriage equality fan;

by Jeremy Hooper

Very interesting that Newt Gingrich would isolate this as one of the eighteen "attacks" for which he must answer if he wants to be the GOP's presidential nominee:

Screen Shot 2011-11-21 At 10.35.14 Am
http://www.newt.org/answers#Dede

As many of you know, this is the 2009 race that the National Organization For Marriage turned into a referendum on same-sex marriage (with truly nasty mailers), and which they've used ever since to show their "toughness" against lawmakers who support equality. Even though the NOM-backed Hoffman ultimately lost to Democrat Bill Owens (turning the state Democratic for the first time since the Civil War), the organization and its conservative pals have tried everything in their power to turn "Scozzafaving" into a verb: Their ability to browbeat Dede out of the race being supposed "proof" of NOM's power to make an example out of those Republicans who stand on the right side of history. It's the exact same tactic they're using in NY now, in regards to the Republicans who stood with this year's successful marriage equality bill.

So it's just interesting that Gingrich -- who was staunch in his Scozzafava support and critical of those who criticized it -- would see a need to highlight this, his failure to endorse a losing candidate, here two years later, when he needs the anti-marriage-equality social conservatives in his corner. If by "interesting," one means "political calculation above principle."

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails