RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/21/2011

Stepped in deep Dede: Newt apologizes for backing moderate, marriage equality fan;

by Jeremy Hooper

Very interesting that Newt Gingrich would isolate this as one of the eighteen "attacks" for which he must answer if he wants to be the GOP's presidential nominee:

Screen Shot 2011-11-21 At 10.35.14 Am
http://www.newt.org/answers#Dede

As many of you know, this is the 2009 race that the National Organization For Marriage turned into a referendum on same-sex marriage (with truly nasty mailers), and which they've used ever since to show their "toughness" against lawmakers who support equality. Even though the NOM-backed Hoffman ultimately lost to Democrat Bill Owens (turning the state Democratic for the first time since the Civil War), the organization and its conservative pals have tried everything in their power to turn "Scozzafaving" into a verb: Their ability to browbeat Dede out of the race being supposed "proof" of NOM's power to make an example out of those Republicans who stand on the right side of history. It's the exact same tactic they're using in NY now, in regards to the Republicans who stood with this year's successful marriage equality bill.

So it's just interesting that Gingrich -- who was staunch in his Scozzafava support and critical of those who criticized it -- would see a need to highlight this, his failure to endorse a losing candidate, here two years later, when he needs the anti-marriage-equality social conservatives in his corner. If by "interesting," one means "political calculation above principle."

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails