RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/06/2011

Complacency vs. principled stand: Raleigh City Council may rebuke discriminatory ban

by Jeremy Hooper

The City Council of Raleigh, NC, will vote this afternoon on whether or not to publicly disavow the proposed anti-gay marriage amendment that will mar the state's landscape for the next six months:

The city's Human Rights Commission, an advisory group, has recommended that the City Council take a public stance opposing the amendment. The issue is on the agenda of Tuesday's council meeting.
Read more: Meeker opposes gay-marriage ban [News Observer]

The meeting begins around 1PM. Which direction the state's clock goes from there could very much be affected by the Council's advisory vote.

***

**UPDATE: 6-2: Raleigh City Council calls discrimination what it is [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails