RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/28/2011

NC: Marriage not creature of state, says group hoping to turn state into marriage-banning creature

by Jeremy Hooper

More from those North Carolinians who are trying to ban CIVIL marriage for same-sex couples:

Some believe that marriage finds its source in God, while others believe it was birthed by ancient civil society. What can be agreed on, however, is that marriage is not a creature of the State.
The Advent of Same-Sex “Marriage” [NCFPC]

Marriage is not a creature of the state? Fine -- THEN STOP GETTING THE CIVIL MARRIAGE LICENSE FROM YOUR STATE! Otherwise: Yes, your marriage, my marriage, and everyone else's marriage is, quite inarguably, a creature of the state, regardless of whatever historical or theological weight we might personally choose to see at its root!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails