RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor » NOM resorts to blatant lying in its 2015 #March4Marriage materials » NOM coalition partner: America will fall unless you March For Marriage » AFA helps SCOTUS see that opposition to *civil* marriage equality is all about religious fervor » Video: Did this Texas 'biblical marriage' rally assemble least diverse crowd in recorded human history? » About those children of fractured families who keep blaming same-sex parenting for their issues... » Ha! NOM uses ad for a desk to represent president's real office  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/03/2012

Man who recently spoke right after Mitt Romney at top GOP event: 'Let's fine gay sex'

by Jeremy Hooper

In a post wherein he equates homosexuality in general with unprotected sex in porn, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer -- a man who routinely gets major booking right alongside GOP presidential frontrunners -- comes out and admits what we all know: That he wants gay sex punishable by a fine or other means:

Homosexual sex ought to be against public policy, simply as a matter of public health. It is behavior which is immoral, unnatural and unhealthy.

Following the lead of homosexual activists, let’s make unprotected gay sex subject to a fine, out of compassion for homosexuals and out of a desire to do what we can to protect their fragile sexual health. It’s a place to start
FULL: Penalty For Gay Sex: Whatever Gay activists want it to be [AFA]

The whole piece is reprehensible on its face. But it's even more egregious when you consider that Bryan completely misrepresents the central notion of his piece. He says that a Los Angeles ballot initiative deciding whether adult film actors must wear condoms is about gay porn in particular. In truth, the ballot initiative is in regards to the adult film industry at large. It's not a homosexuality debate -- it's an adult film performance debate!

But with Bryan, criminal sanctions on homosexuality are the preconceived given. Whatever he says to get from point A to point B? Purely semantics.

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E88E5D8A5970D-130

*Don't think Bryan Fischer matters? Well ask yourself: Do you get this kind of access?

201201031227

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails