RECENT  POSTS:  » Photo: NOM thinks its discriminatory cause is young and hip; adorable » An inside look at POTUS's evolution circa 2011–2012 » More animus from Texas' key 'protect marriage' guy » GLAAD: Why would we silence unwittingly helpful voices like yours, Peter LaBarbera? » Photo: NOM fully (and finally) owning its wholly faith-driven root » Our winning movement wins another one: Judge says Ohio must recognize out-of-state marriages » Video: Tony Perkins is pissssssssssssed at Chick-fil-a » You must be so proud of this headline, @ChristianPost » READ: Full page 'NY Times' ad pleas to supposedly refreshing new Pope: Take strong stand for LGBT youth » Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, and—activists who try to strip certain citizens of certain civil rights?!  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/03/2012

Man who recently spoke right after Mitt Romney at top GOP event: 'Let's fine gay sex'

by Jeremy Hooper

In a post wherein he equates homosexuality in general with unprotected sex in porn, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer -- a man who routinely gets major booking right alongside GOP presidential frontrunners -- comes out and admits what we all know: That he wants gay sex punishable by a fine or other means:

Homosexual sex ought to be against public policy, simply as a matter of public health. It is behavior which is immoral, unnatural and unhealthy.

Following the lead of homosexual activists, let’s make unprotected gay sex subject to a fine, out of compassion for homosexuals and out of a desire to do what we can to protect their fragile sexual health. It’s a place to start
FULL: Penalty For Gay Sex: Whatever Gay activists want it to be [AFA]

The whole piece is reprehensible on its face. But it's even more egregious when you consider that Bryan completely misrepresents the central notion of his piece. He says that a Los Angeles ballot initiative deciding whether adult film actors must wear condoms is about gay porn in particular. In truth, the ballot initiative is in regards to the adult film industry at large. It's not a homosexuality debate -- it's an adult film performance debate!

But with Bryan, criminal sanctions on homosexuality are the preconceived given. Whatever he says to get from point A to point B? Purely semantics.

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E88E5D8A5970D-130

*Don't think Bryan Fischer matters? Well ask yourself: Do you get this kind of access?

201201031227

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails