RECENT  POSTS:  » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/31/2012

Minn. For Marriage: It's about church -- they state it!

by Jeremy Hooper

On its organizational website, Minnesota For Marriage calls this one of their "generic" website badges:

300X250-Join
[Minn For Marriage Downloads]

A message that might be generic for those who have completely given themselves over to the notion that the civil marriage license is written with heavenly ink. But for those of us who realize that this fight is about the civil component of marriage and not the ancillary religious ceremonial aspect, this web badge comes across as pretty darn branded. A brand that, unfortunately, sees religious freedom as an entitlement to an unfettered right for certain faith views to trump all other freedoms, even as those of us who engage for the civil freedoms make no attempt -- NO ATTEMPT! -- at maligning religious freedom in its true sense.

They, the self-appointed "values voters," have God's one, infallible blueprint, apparently. The rest of us are but mere onlookers who, if we're lucky enough, might get to glimpse on at their lives fully lived. But while we might be obligated to support their building processes through our tax dollars and assorted civil contributions, they do not think we are entitled to our own design. They're not even hiding this thoroughly stifling reality. And why should they, really, considering the relatively small number of us who stand up against it?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails