RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/31/2012

Minn. For Marriage: It's about church -- they state it!

by Jeremy Hooper

On its organizational website, Minnesota For Marriage calls this one of their "generic" website badges:

300X250-Join
[Minn For Marriage Downloads]

A message that might be generic for those who have completely given themselves over to the notion that the civil marriage license is written with heavenly ink. But for those of us who realize that this fight is about the civil component of marriage and not the ancillary religious ceremonial aspect, this web badge comes across as pretty darn branded. A brand that, unfortunately, sees religious freedom as an entitlement to an unfettered right for certain faith views to trump all other freedoms, even as those of us who engage for the civil freedoms make no attempt -- NO ATTEMPT! -- at maligning religious freedom in its true sense.

They, the self-appointed "values voters," have God's one, infallible blueprint, apparently. The rest of us are but mere onlookers who, if we're lucky enough, might get to glimpse on at their lives fully lived. But while we might be obligated to support their building processes through our tax dollars and assorted civil contributions, they do not think we are entitled to our own design. They're not even hiding this thoroughly stifling reality. And why should they, really, considering the relatively small number of us who stand up against it?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails