RECENT  POSTS:  » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/18/2012

NOM, constant critic of 'out of state cash', ponies up a little more

by Jeremy Hooper

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E8Ac8263F970DIt's always interesting to see how much money NOM will promise to any given state. New York got a two million dollar vow, while Jersey is again standing in NY's shadow with only a $500k offer. Other states like Maryland have been offered one million buckarooskies.

But as for Washington state? Well, it seems NOM's get a little more stingy:

Olympia, WA — The National Organization for Marriage (NOM), the nation's leading pro-marriage organization, today announced that it will spend $250,000 to help fund primary challenges to any Republican legislator who crosses the party platform and votes in favor of same-sex marriage. NOM will also work with pro-marriage grassroots organizations to ensure that the people of Washington have the chance to vote on marriage in November 2012.
NOM Pledges $250K to Fund Primary Challenges to Any Washington State Republican Senator Who Votes to Redefine Marriage [NOM]

Who knows why they're offering less? Maybe since the state already has domestic partnerships, they see the "threat" as milder. Maybe they see it as less winnable. Maybe they have too much money going around elsewhere. Or maybe Brian Brown had a life-changing weekend in Seattle circa 1993, with Eddie Vedder and Chris Cornell's flanneled hospitality leaving the NOM president with an eternal vow to keep Washington in his good graces.

But whatever the reason, they're still coughing up a substantial wad from the seemingly limitless NOM well, for the sole purpose of ruining Republicans who don't see hurting gay people as a part requirement. And that's wrong, no matter the amount.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails