RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years » Video: Mississippian who made soldier his lifestyle choice seeks freedom based on unchosen orientation » One of America's most anti-gay organizations rallies for the Duggars; because of course they would  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/18/2012

NOM, constant critic of 'out of state cash', ponies up a little more

by Jeremy Hooper

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E8Ac8263F970DIt's always interesting to see how much money NOM will promise to any given state. New York got a two million dollar vow, while Jersey is again standing in NY's shadow with only a $500k offer. Other states like Maryland have been offered one million buckarooskies.

But as for Washington state? Well, it seems NOM's get a little more stingy:

Olympia, WA — The National Organization for Marriage (NOM), the nation's leading pro-marriage organization, today announced that it will spend $250,000 to help fund primary challenges to any Republican legislator who crosses the party platform and votes in favor of same-sex marriage. NOM will also work with pro-marriage grassroots organizations to ensure that the people of Washington have the chance to vote on marriage in November 2012.
NOM Pledges $250K to Fund Primary Challenges to Any Washington State Republican Senator Who Votes to Redefine Marriage [NOM]

Who knows why they're offering less? Maybe since the state already has domestic partnerships, they see the "threat" as milder. Maybe they see it as less winnable. Maybe they have too much money going around elsewhere. Or maybe Brian Brown had a life-changing weekend in Seattle circa 1993, with Eddie Vedder and Chris Cornell's flanneled hospitality leaving the NOM president with an eternal vow to keep Washington in his good graces.

But whatever the reason, they're still coughing up a substantial wad from the seemingly limitless NOM well, for the sole purpose of ruining Republicans who don't see hurting gay people as a part requirement. And that's wrong, no matter the amount.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails