RECENT  POSTS:  » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie' » WND activist: 'Dan Savage has done far worse things than Westboro [Baptist];' says to send him to Iraq to challenge those who hang gays » Michael Sam's teammate offers perfect response to silly shower 'story' » Photo: Negligent NOM posts baby with choking hazard; will someone please think of the children?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/23/2012

Bryan Fischer calls up slave imagery; that's dumb of him

by Jeremy Hooper

You really have to wonder why someone like Bryan Fischer would Tweet a historical comparison like this one, which he made in reaction to yesterday's DOMA ruling:

Screen Shot 2012-02-23 At 2.03.20 Pm [@BryanJFischer]

I mean think about it: Even those on the conservative side of things can't possibly see the all-out banning of same-sex marriage as actually freeing any kind of people. At the best, they would be preserving the "traditional values" they hold dear. They themselves claim this. And when they do claim to be on the side of greater freedom, few buy what is so obviously and patently untrue.

So what value or mileage does Bryan, one of the most hostile anti-LGBT voices on the scene, hope to get out of such a comparison? Obviously in this imperfect comparison, gay people are the ones on less-free side of things. Again, I think even many conservatives who think gays deserve to be less free would agree that their efforts are limiting or at least stagnating freedoms -- certainly not expanding them. So through what sort of calculation is Bryan using that makes him think a Tweet like this is helping his cause? If anything, isn't he just highlighting the parallels from which his movement works to distance itself?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails