RECENT  POSTS:  » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/01/2012

Maine: The most suspect of NOM's pro-smokescreen pushes

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2012-02-01 At 9.18.17 AmThe Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices will have to take additional steps before disclosure becomes mandatory. Plus NOM has vowed to continue to appeal this thing all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. But still, it's nice to know that the momentum towards getting America's most aggressive anti-equality organization to comply with Maine's disclosure laws is heading in our direction, not theirs:

BREAKING: US Court of Appeals Holds Maine Law in NOM Disclosure Suits [NOM Exposed]

At this point, NOM only continues to look worse and worse, with every step raising more questions. I mean, seriously -- what happened in Maine that they are so darn eager to hide?! Did the Pope himself pony up?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails