RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Hallmark features openly in love couple (who happen to be lesbians) » NOM's 'International Org. For Marriage' gets an Executive Director » FRC prays for judges, governors, legislators to ignore marriage equality rulings » Read: AFA plays innocent about making Bryan Fischer a known pundit; no one's buying it » Yes you will coexist with civil marriage equality, Tony Perkins; that's a demand, not a request » Report: The AFA has fired Bryan Fischer as Director of Issue Analysis » Video: These Alabama anti-gay protestors sound exactly like parody versions of Alabama anti-gay protestors » Audio: Activist judge Roy Moore gives rambling, unconvincing interview to Tony Perkins » NOM reveals plan for taking people's money even though they've clearly lost » Openly anti-gay Chief Justice of AL Supreme Court vows to openly defy marriage equality  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/27/2012

NOM pushes 'cultural vandalism' claim; I say 'yes, please do!'

by Jeremy Hooper

On NOM Blog, the writer is pushing the former Archbishop of Canterbury's claim that same-sex marriage is a form of "cultural and theological vandalism":

Screen Shot 2012-02-27 At 11.28.56 Am
[NOM Blog]

It's really dumb of NOM to do this.

We are at a point in the debate now where most every American has had a chance to see a married same-sex couple. Whether it be in the media or closer to home, almost everyone has experience with the idea of two human beings of the same gender sealing their bond in love. At one time, the idea was much more theoretical. Now it is not. It is in our culture.

So now, when groups like NOM propagates phrases like "cultural vandalism," it's starting to sound nastier and nastier to more and more people. Vandalism is a term we use for things (homes, land, businesses). The instruments of vandalism are harsh (spray paint, rocks, baseball bats). By fostering this kind of term for a debate that's becoming more human by the day, NOM is willfully attaching its resistance movement to cold, uncaring, inhumane, misplaced rhetoric. For a debate as dependent on the so-called movable middle as this one, it's really doltish for the team that's already contending with claims of animus to further dehumanize their efforts.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails