RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


Video: MN For Marriage denies anti-gay amendment is a 'ban'; I agree (if they're talking about the deodorant)

by Jeremy Hooper

Kalley Yanta's back with more "preserve marriage" spin:

Relatedly, a local duck is asking residents to judge him not on how he walks or talks, but on the basis of press department's poll-tested assessments.


**Note: Kalley Yanta has already admitted her fight is against "immoral actions" and the "homosexual lifestyle," not just civil marriage.


*REMINDER: The National Organization For Marriage -- the overlords of MN For Marriage -- tells supporters to never use the word "ban." To wit:

Language to avoid at all costs: "Ban same-sex marriage." Our base loves this wording. So do supporters of SSM. They know it causes us to lose about ten percentage points in polls. Don’t use it. Say we’re against “redefining marriage” or in favor or “marriage as the union of husband and wife” NEVER “banning same-sex marriage.” [NOM]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails