RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/28/2012

Video: MN For Marriage denies anti-gay amendment is a 'ban'; I agree (if they're talking about the deodorant)

by Jeremy Hooper

Kalley Yanta's back with more "preserve marriage" spin:

Relatedly, a local duck is asking residents to judge him not on how he walks or talks, but on the basis of press department's poll-tested assessments.

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E88E5D8A5970D-137

**Note: Kalley Yanta has already admitted her fight is against "immoral actions" and the "homosexual lifestyle," not just civil marriage.

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E88E5D8A5970D-137

*REMINDER: The National Organization For Marriage -- the overlords of MN For Marriage -- tells supporters to never use the word "ban." To wit:

Language to avoid at all costs: "Ban same-sex marriage." Our base loves this wording. So do supporters of SSM. They know it causes us to lose about ten percentage points in polls. Don’t use it. Say we’re against “redefining marriage” or in favor or “marriage as the union of husband and wife” NEVER “banning same-sex marriage.” [NOM]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails