RECENT  POSTS:  » The empty threats phase of the fight » Omaha, NE, resident helps show America what unchecked homo-hostility looks like » Christian developer creates 'Kill The F*ggots' game; parents proven right about video games potentially rotting brains » WND readers: Marriage equality will either not affect us or end us completely » AFA: Gay rights = 'grave threat to our survival as a nation and as a moral and civilized people' » Tony Perkins: Baltimore unrest might be godly punishment for declaring 'moral rights to that which is morally wrong' » The oddity that is the LGBT rights debate circa 2015 » Video: 'Vox' lays out eleven year journey toward a bettered America » Why's the far-right putting a long discarded fear card back in the deck? » 'The newly stigmatized' Maggie Gallagher  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/01/2012

Video: The Sanctity of -- GINGRICH?!

by Jeremy Hooper

Molotov Mitchell has said heinous things about LGBT people, to name just one group. But I'm actually going to give him sincere props on this, his willingness to break from the pack (super pack?) and call out his fellow "pro-family" evangelicals for their bizarre and hypocritical support of one Newton Leroy Gingrich:

On this, he's right. So is Maggie Gallagher, who's been spilling much anti-Gingrich ink. The so-called "values voters" who are rallying behind Gingrich are making a laughing stock out of many of their movement's longheld stands. Chief among those stands? "Marriage protection."

The "protect marriage" crowd holds us to points made by activists during the Carter years. They claim we work from manifestos written before many of us were even born. When they pin something on us, they won't let it go even when the truth that belies their talking points is fully and carefully explained to them. And yet they, the ones who declare one certain standard and template, are telling everyone to just overlook and move on from one of the messiest personal marriage records of any modern political candidate from any party? That's rank hypocrisy, my friends. And as I've been saying for months: If it goes the distance, it will hand us our marriage victory on a silver platter.

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E88E5D8A5970D-153

*RELATED: If Newt Gingrich is the nominee, the GOP loses the marriage debate [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails