RECENT  POSTS:  » GOP pollster Luntz to Heritage Foundation's Anderson: 'Gay marriage is harmless' » Read: Federal court judge rules against Colorado's discriminatory marriage ban » You guys, will you please pipe down so Sen. Rubio can dismantle your deserved freedoms? » 'Mask is coming off' LGBTs, says man who vowed to export and/or criminalize LGBTs » Exxon, infamous holdout on fair and decent employment protections, could be running out of options » Oregon baker who refused same-sex wedding cake bakes for 'ex-gay' org » PFOX rebrands; into group play, seemingly » Audio: Listen to this ADF spinmeister and his anti-gay spin » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/14/2012

WA-scrimination 2.0: Stand For Marriage Washington gets new name, new stock photo families

by Jeremy Hooper

They've found some stock photos and bought a new domain name. The Stand For Marriage Washington Coalition -- which under its old incarnation, had already positioned itself as quite extreme -- is now operating as Preserve Marriage Washington:

Screen Shot 2012-02-14 At 9.00.36 Am

Personally I like how the kid on the far right of the clip art seems to be doing a Susanna Hoffs "Walk Like an Egyptian" routine. He or she seems like the rebel who will break from the heterosexist clutches and march in a pro-equality parade. I like that in a clip art kid.

But rebellious illustrations aside, I really have to wonder if the obvious animus of folks like Pastor Ken Hutcherson and previous Stand For Marriage Washington head Cindy Zapotocky might be the reason for this reboot. If so, I totally called it.

6A00D8341C503453Ef014E88E5D8A5970D-167

*NOTE: NOM is claiming that this is simply a unifying move which brings together the Family Policy Institute of Washington, Concerned Women For America, NOM, and the Stand For Marriage Washington team. But that makes absolutely no sense. The Stand For Marriage Washington effort was itself a coalition created for the sole purpose of unifying the movement, and it already included all of the aforementioned groups:

Screen Shot 2012-02-03 At 8.37.57 Am
[Stand For Marriage Washington]

The only logical reason to change the earlier identity -- which already had a launch press conference, even -- is if that identity was doing damage.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails