RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/15/2012

Wait, NOM now *wants* the states to be a ‘system of laboratories’?!

by Jeremy Hooper
Nationalorganizationformarriage-15 The following little quip fell under the radar last week, but I think we should bring it back for further examination. This is how John Eastman, Maggie Gallagher's replacement as National Organization for Marriage Board Chair, responded to the idea of marriage being a patchwork of state-level rights:


“We have this system of laboratories called the states where we can try different experiments and see what works well and what doesn’t, without imposing a national rule on everybody,” said [National Org. For Marriage Chair John Eastman], a professor at Chapman University School of Law in Orange, California.

“We have patchwork laws on all sorts of things” that vary from one state to another, such as custody laws and third-cousin marriages, Eastman said in an interview. “It hasn’t seemed to have brought us down yet."

State-by-State Laws on Gay Marriage Produce Patchwork Quilt [Bloomberg]
(H/t: NOM Watcher John B.)


So okay, wait a minute: NOM's top guy is seriously suggesting his organization is okay with states doing their own things? That is crazy off-message for NOM. Or at least crazy off-message for the old NOM. For the new, "all things to all people of all states" NOM, Eastman's lines actually make a bit of sense from a PR standpoint.
KEEP READING: Wait, NOM now *wants* the states to be a ‘system of laboratories’?! [NOM Exposed]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails