RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/01/2012

Audio: Newt's not gonna let Santorum have *all* of the man-on-dog vote

by Jeremy Hooper

If I were running for President (HOOPER/CLINTON 2032!) and someone compared anti-LGBT people's faith beliefs to that which might exist between a monkey and the moon, I'd step in and correct the caller's offensive equation. But when a man runs on the GOP ticket in our current day (NOT GONNA/HAPPEN 2012!), he apparently sees no need to correct a caller who liken gay and lesbian citizens' love lives to woman-on-dog, man-on-cow relations. In fact, he gladly builds on her thoughts as a continuation of his "ban the gays" tirade.

Via the indefatigable, indispensable opp. research artisans at Right Wing Watch:


Gingrich Pledges to Fight Gay Rights 'Chaos' and Obama's 'Anti-Christian, Anti-Jewish' Views [RWW]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails