RECENT  POSTS:  » What must drive the anti-gay activists crazy » I can't keep pretending to care about [insert activist] saying [insert ridiculous thing] » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/29/2012

Bertrand Russell & MN For Marriage: '[T]he infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists'

by Jeremy Hooper

And now Bertrand Russell, an early champion of reforming the United Kingdom's laws on homosexuality, will give you his views on marriage, circa 1928:

Screen Shot 2012-03-29 At 8.28.37 AmScreen Shot 2012-03-29 At 8.28.50 Am
Screen Shot 2012-03-29 At 8.29.02 Am
[SOURCE: Sceptical Essays, pg. 4-5, 1928, Routledge Classics edition]

And now Minnesota For Marriage, an organization working from a largely Catholic standpoint in order to impose their own morality onto the state's marriage law, will give you their take on Russell:

Screen Shot 2012-03-29 At 7.36.54 Am

I can't tell you for sure how Russell would respond to this reduction of his words, largely because I don't know how to translate the sound of rolling over in a grave to text form. But perhaps this prescient message about love and tolerance will help:

Wise. The opposite of altering a state's document so that it becomes a weapon against certain kinds of people.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails