RECENT  POSTS:  » AFA, LaBarbera think being publicly pro-gay is still a liability; how quaint » Video: Blended family with lesbian moms heads Tylenol holiday ad » NOM's new conspiracy theory: Census Bureau making changes to hide marriage equality's ill effects » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/09/2012

MN's Campaign Finance Board, in possession of rules for a reason, to examine why some don't seem to care

by Jeremy Hooper

At this point, we need to just make a form letter. Something like: NOM is under scrutiny for [somehow acting shade with disclosure laws] during [some marriage campaign] in [some state] during [some year].

While I create such a form, go read how the Minnesota edition of this common occurrence is ramping up:

Nationalorganizationformarriage-21 NOM Exposed has learned the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Election Board is moving forward with an investigation into the campaign finance activities of Minnesota for Marriage, the umbrella group co-founded by the National Organization for Marriage. This is the primary group working to pass the anti-gay constitutional amendment in MN.
KEEP READING: BREAKING: MN Elections Board Launches Investigation into Lead Anti-Gay Coalition [NOM Exposed]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails