RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/30/2012

NOM finds support in Peter 'export the homosexuals' Sprigg

by Jeremy Hooper

Peter Sprigg responds to the NOM scandal:

Screen Shot 2012-03-30 At 4.18.49 Pm

No, no, Peter -- you're confused. The issue is that they expressly said that they wanted to actively drive a wedge between gays and blacks. You know, like you once actively expressed your desire to drive a wedge between gays and the United States of America:


*SOURCE: Gays seek immigration reform [Medill Reports]

Certain things transcend "liberal vs. conservative," Peter Sprigg. Thankfully America has not heeded your call for exportation so that we gays here at home can continue to connect these overdue dots.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails