RECENT  POSTS:  » FRC writer: We're not all the same, 'gay agenda' is 'dangerous for the wellbeing of this nation' » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy' » Legal profession made up of ideologues, demands legal ideologue » FRC's senior fellow for exporting/criminalizing gay people bemoan's discrimination's dwindling acceptance » (ARCHIVED): President signs executive order protecting LGBT workers » That discriminatory Colorado baker won't make Halloween cakes either » Catholic Bishops again go after basic workplace protections for LGBT people  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/30/2012

NOM finds support in Peter 'export the homosexuals' Sprigg

by Jeremy Hooper

Peter Sprigg responds to the NOM scandal:

Screen Shot 2012-03-30 At 4.18.49 Pm

No, no, Peter -- you're confused. The issue is that they expressly said that they wanted to actively drive a wedge between gays and blacks. You know, like you once actively expressed your desire to drive a wedge between gays and the United States of America:


*SOURCE: Gays seek immigration reform [Medill Reports]

Certain things transcend "liberal vs. conservative," Peter Sprigg. Thankfully America has not heeded your call for exportation so that we gays here at home can continue to connect these overdue dots.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails