RECENT  POSTS:  » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out » But your subjective view of 'real' marriage is factually irrelevant, Ryan » Flip Benham (yes, their dad) reportedly protesting outside NC weddings » TV's Duggar family continues anti-LGBT activism » Caught ya: Far-right's latest marriage 'victim' edited website to make more solid legal case » Read: Wyoming to become our 32nd marriage equality state » GLAAD: Victory is what happens while you're busy making other plans » What fake victimization sounds like in Arizona » Federal judge strikes Arizona's discriminatory marriage ban; marriages should begin today! » NOM's latest desperation: Relying on hearsay James O'Keefe video to smear Democrat for 'secretly' not opposing equality  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/21/2012

NOM acknowledges #glaadcap; uncaps sad truth about own support base

by Jeremy Hooper

NOM, an organization with a whopping five people (currently) whose own words are featured on the GLAAD Commentator Accountability Projects (Robert George, Maggie Gallagher, Brian Brown, Jennifer Roback Morse, Christopher Plante), has posted its first acknowledgment of the the list, turning to incendiary anti-LGBT voice Michael "God Has A Better WaY" Brown for an assist. But in doing so, NOM has shown us just how much animus the organization cultivates on a daily basis. Check out the comment that immediately follows:

201203211123
[SOURCE: NOM Blog]

Now, of course every site gets a comment from time to time with which the writer or host organization does not agree. There have been a few here on G-A-Y that I don't personally support (and I always take the time to say so when the comments are pointed out to me).

But that being said, it would be negligent to ignore the frequency with which it occurs on the other side. The sad reality is that if you leave an anti-equality organization's forum open and unmoderated, these kinds of comments are much closer to the the rule than they are to the exception. Because the truth is that while one can oppose LGBT rights without being personally anti-LGBT, it's extremely difficult for an organization to take a public stand against LGBT rights without being inundated with supporters who go far beyond whatever cause the host organization might have even intended (see NOM's 7/24 NYC rally). On their side, there is a sizable contention that does, quite literally, see gay people as disordered and in need of some sort of a cure. It's the sad truth that groups like NOM work so hard to hide (which is precisely why their forums are typically moderated/closed).

Plus, with NOM now engaging in outreach with organizations that come right out and admit they see us as filthy, degrading, and capable of wrecking societies, it's becoming harder to see comments like the above as something the organization even wants to deny.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails