RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/21/2012

Video: The 'sanctity' of majority tyranny

by Jeremy Hooper

Unanimous high court opinions don't matter. Tax-paying gay couples who are already marrying without incident don't matter. The crucial principle of protecting minorities from the whims of a (faith-motivated) majority don't matter. In Iowa conservative circles circa 2012, it's only Bob Vander Plaats, his equating same-sex marriage to incest, his self-victimization, and his like-minded out-of-state allies who deserve to be heard and praised:


(H/t: Towle)

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails