RECENT  POSTS:  » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/26/2012

Another intended supporter says @Vote4MarriageNC goes too far; 'Duh!', say gays, fair-minded allies, future

by Jeremy Hooper

Democratic sponsor of North Carolina's anti-gay marriage amendment seeks to unring bell:

Amendment One SPONSOR now says he will vote against it (and lies about his past support of it) [PHB]

That's the thing about opening the Pandora's Box that is civil discrimination: one doesn't get to pick and choose which negatives he or she wants to enact. You order the full enchilada, you deal with the unintended flatulence.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails