RECENT  POSTS:  » AFA's Director of Issues Analysis: LGBT activists possess 'unvarnished energy of Satan himself » Wait, FRC has been able to 'uphold natural marriage'? That's news to all non–cave dwellers! » Because when am I not calling up Fox News personalities to do my bidding? » Anti-equality conservative admits GLAAD CAP is 'smart' and 'effective' » You know what's not presidential? Like at all? » Inevitable justice temporarily delayed in Alabama » Read: Fed. judge strikes Alabama marriage ban; no stay on ruling » Derisively remembering when full equality was in 'Jeopardy!' » When all else fails, demand your letters are capitalized » Major Iowa caucus player calls on next President to 'politely reject unjust SCOTUS opinions'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/09/2012

FACT: Nobody's rushing to defend Brian Brown

by Jeremy Hooper

FACT: The Washington Times is one of the most conservative newspapers in the country.

FACT: Conservatives use the internet

FACT: Brian Brown wrote a piece for The Washington Times

FACT: Brian Brown shot said piece out to NOM supporters via the NOM blog and social media

FACT: Despite the effort, Brian's piece has eighteen comments pushing back against his spin and only one comment defending NOM. Oh, and that one pro-NOM comment goes well beyond just marriage and instead knocks gay people as human beings.

The EVIDENCE:

Brian Brown's misguided Washington Times piece [Wash Times]

JEREMY'S OPINION:

The lack of defense that NOM has been able to drum up during this scandal is almost more powerful than anything we have said or can say!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails