RECENT  POSTS:  » Riiiiiiight, FRC. And 'Desperate Housewives' is still TV's hot new show, too » After death do us part: Indignity of Idaho's marriage ban threatens lesbian veteran's final wishes » NOM's Chair to Oregon: We have a right to tell courts our personal, conservative Catholic opinions! » Nice try, anti-equality movement, but the lesbian 'throuple' story makes our argument, not yours » Jonah Goldberg can't see the hornets' nest for its hornets » Video: Male on mail » Jodie Foster in 2013: 'I am'; Jodie Foster in 2014: 'I do' » AFA promotes its new app in only way it knows how » Robert Oscar Lopez says I perform 'psychological operations routine' on him when I quote his own words from his own web site » Matt Barber's ever-classy site suggests gay people are literally crushing fellow humans  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/09/2012

FACT: Nobody's rushing to defend Brian Brown

by Jeremy Hooper

FACT: The Washington Times is one of the most conservative newspapers in the country.

FACT: Conservatives use the internet

FACT: Brian Brown wrote a piece for The Washington Times

FACT: Brian Brown shot said piece out to NOM supporters via the NOM blog and social media

FACT: Despite the effort, Brian's piece has eighteen comments pushing back against his spin and only one comment defending NOM. Oh, and that one pro-NOM comment goes well beyond just marriage and instead knocks gay people as human beings.

The EVIDENCE:

Brian Brown's misguided Washington Times piece [Wash Times]

JEREMY'S OPINION:

The lack of defense that NOM has been able to drum up during this scandal is almost more powerful than anything we have said or can say!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails