RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/25/2012

Video: Bryan Fischer's callers convince him his CNN appearance was beneficial

by Jeremy Hooper

At the end of this clip, noted voice of extremism Bryan Fischer says something really revelatory. The visible and right-connected AFA personality admits that even many diehard conservatives are quite troubled by what Bryan sees as good punditry, but what the world increasingly (and rightly) sees as nasty, unhelpful, deeply offensive attacks:

I had this same conversation yesterday with several people from carried walks of life. Even objectively, I seriously can't see any way that Bryan Fischer's CNN appearance benefited anyone except those of us who are hoping to connect some crucial dots about anti-LGBT activism. For the Romney campaign, it showed how truly nasty anti-LGBT social conservatism can and does get (which is an extremely pertinent point since Romney will soon speak at the most anti-LGBT, socially conservative college in America). For the AFA, it showed the laughability of the claims that the organization is geared towards "pro-family" rather than anti-gay politics. For other socially conservative pundits, it showed how important it is to hold these figureheads accountable for the deeply divisive rhetoric that they so routinely use (something most of them fear).

But for LGBT Americans, while the mere fact that this kind of thing still happens on American television at all comes across as a complete and utter negative, the fact that it happened the way it did does help us show the public how nasty it can get. I seriously do applaud Bryan Fischer for having the spine to actually stand for what he believes and say on CNN the same kind of thing that he says on his own show (which is exactly what projects like the GLAAD Commentator Accountability Project want to see more of). That said, he must now have enough fortitude to admit that he is pushing a message that is most likely a liability to the GOP from here on out. We do not live in Bryan Fischer's America—not anymore. We will not return to Bryan Fischer's America—never again. If the GOP embraces his tone, then that will come at the expense of the party's growth and future relevancy. If the GOP rejects his tone, it will force social conservatives to make crucial choices about where they stand, where they draw the line, and whether they will even vote this cycle.

Fischer is forcing some interesting national conversation. I just don't see how any objective voice (a.k.a not one of Bryan's callers) could deny that LGBT activists and allies benefits from having him out there.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails