RECENT  POSTS:  » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead » Congressional right wing's right-side-of-history whip count: 8–271 » NOM, Manhattan Declaration turn Unitarian's anti-slavery, anti-war into pro-discrimination anthem » Matt Barber and Peter LaBarbera tease America's coming anti-gay street revolts » FRC writer: We're not all the same, 'gay agenda' is 'dangerous for the wellbeing of this nation' » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/24/2012

Video: Minnesota for [covenant] Marriage

by Jeremy Hooper

At some point they, the citizens of an America that has had marriage equality in some states for almost a decade now, will have to stop claiming that marriage has been man/woman "throughout history and all societies." But today's not the day, at least not for Minnesota For Marriage:


(h/t: J.M.G.)

I also can't help but notice how much more openly religious the organized opposition is getting. That's a change we're seeing this year. Typically they do a sort of official/unofficial campaign thing, with the former sticking firmly to a message that talks about public schools and supposed threats posed by civil marriage equality while letting aligned-but-independent agents do the religious outreach. But this year, in Minnesota and especially in North Carolina, we're seeing official campaign ads like this one talk about the "covenant delivered to us by God." It's certainly a tactical shift.

My assumption is that these folks know they are losing the middle so they have to even more fully rally the far-right. But will it work, talking so much about the ancillary (even if oft-utilized) religious ceremonial component of marriage (which will in no way be altered by *civil* marriage equality)? Perhaps in the short run. In the long run, however, it only shows how they, the ones forcing us into this "culture war," are hosting a completely different conversation from us, the ones seeking both constitutional freedoms and respecting *true* religious freedom. There is simply no way our pertinent, legally-grounded conversation will lose in the end.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails